Terry J. Allen |802.229.0303
Vermont & NYC| tallen@igc.org

In New York City’s East Village, a string of Indian restaurants stretches side-by-side for a block along Sixth Street. The running joke is that tucked behind the row is one kitchen that dishes up the same food for all the restaurants. But while that model makes for urban myth on Sixth St., it is nearer to corporate reality when it comes to pet foods.

Until a few weeks ago, Americans might have been amused to imagine that—despite the varieties of colors and adorably shaped fishes, bones and jolly little stars—the multitudinous brands of major pet foods come from the same factory kitchen. However, a recall of possibly poisoned cat and dog food revealed that for four months ending on March 6, Canadian-based Menu Foods Income Fund produced ingredients that ended up in 100 brands manufactured in two U.S. plants.

No one knows how many pets ate the tainted chow before companies recalled 60 million cans, pouches, biscuits, kibbles and treats. The Food and Drug Administration listed 250 different flavors of recalled cat food alone.

Adding to the bad taste is that Menu Foods is an income trust, a kind of Canadian tax dodge, sometimes equated with Ponzi schemes. It will be interesting to see how readily that financial structure regurgitates the millions in potential damages.

Menu Foods’ suspect ingredient was 1.7 million pounds of wheat gluten imported from China by Las Vegas-based ChemNutra. ChemNutra’s PR firm admitted that the company had sold the gluten to three other pet-food makers, but told In These Times that confidentiality agreements precluded revealing the names.

The FDA called the company names "commercial confidential information," raising questions not only about the distribution of the wheat gluten, but about the secrecy of the regulatory process itself.

ChemNutra also appears less than transparent. It "has not filed as a Nevada corporation," reports Las Vegas ReviewJournal.com, and California listed its "incorporation status as ‘surrender,’ which means the company has voluntarily surrendered its right to transact business in California."

But while ChemNutra and Menu Foods may lack corporate pedigrees, the pet food industry they supply boasts top breeds. Three of the five major pet food companies in the United States are subsidiaries of major multinational companies: NestlŽ, Heinz and Colgate-Palmolive. Other pet food biggies include Procter & Gamble, Mars and Nutro.

These companies’ pet foods rely on industrial food production for most of their ingredients, and industrial food relies on the alchemy of pet food to turn its waste into profits. But let’s be clear: What’s wrong with pet food is not that it contains animal parts such as beaks, intestines, animal necks, feet and undeveloped eggs that finicky Americans reject as icky. After all, Fido’s ancestral diet includes deer carcass and Fluffy is partial to rat parts. The problem with pet food—whether it’s ground steak or chopped rectum, sawdust or grain filler—is that with FDA approval, it can include ingredients that are putrid, disease-ridden and filled with the chemicals and pharmaceuticals.

In addition to helping industrial food transform potential garbage, pet food also serves the restaurant industry by buying up tons of used and possibly carcinogenic grease.

And then there is the generous contribution pets themselves may make. The corpses of the seven million homeless cats and dogs euthanized every year have to go somewhere. Many are sent to rendering plants, which sell their products—you guessed it—to the pet food industry. Some pet food manufacturers deny using rendered pets in cat and dog food, but the industry is secretive. FDA oversight is spottier than a Dalmatian, and, short of DNA testing, who’s to know?

We are not talking chopped liver, here; the stakes are huge. Americans fed their 75 million dogs and 88 million cats almost $16 billion worth of food last year. That amount surpasses the GDP of almost 100 of the world’s 229 countries. The $38.5 billion that Americans spent on pets last year is slightly less than the GDP of Kenya for its 35 million people.

Almost a month after the original recall and fully five months after the tainted food was first manufactured, there is still no conclusive evidence about what caused the deaths and illnesses some experts predict will mount into the thousands. Wheat gluten is the chief suspect, but why it was toxic is up for debate. The first possibility was a rat poison found by the New York State lab, but the FDA failed to confirm that finding and pointed to melamine, a plastic not known for serious toxicity.

"The system broke down," said Senate Majority Whip Richard Durbin (D-Ill.) according to the April 6 Washington Post. "It’s not just about contaminated food killing pets, it’s a system that failed."

But in the end, the system that failed feeds not just our pets, but us, too. Bon appetit.









d width="13%" align="left" class="nav-bottom">| DESIGN |